Citing insufficient research, European health bodies from Sweden to France are taking a more conservative approach to “gender-affirming” care for minors. Is the tide turning?
Yes?
It might seem so.
The almost universally accept model of care for a gender-questioning young person has been to affirm his or her own diagnosis — “I’m Trans” and begin the transitioning process. No comprehensive mental health assessment. No consideration of other possible factors causing distress. No recognition of the fact that most gender confusion disappears by the end of puberty. Often in spite of concerns expressed by parents that their child is being rushed along a path that could have disastrous consequences for their child’s future.
Recently, however, the governments of many countries are putting the brakes on the “affirming care” model of treatment for minors.
Europe
In Europe, even traditionally more progressive nations like Finland and Sweden are concerned, as seen in their statements calling for caution. (Emphases added)
- In Finland, a young person requesting care must first be “made aware of the risks associated” with the proposed medical treatments.
- In Sweden, health authorities are putting on the brakes because “the risks of medical treatment ” currently outweigh the possible benefits.”
- In Norway, gender-affirming treatments are to be “defined as experimental.”
- In France, the “greatest reserve” is recommended because of the possible side effects.
- In the United Kingdom, the national gender clinic will cease to operate because of “significant uncertainties” surrounding the use of hormone treatments.”
Australia
In Australia there were calls for a public inquiry when a prominent psychologist was suspended from clinical duties for questioning the use of puberty blockers.
Russia
The Russian Duma has voted in favor of a law to ban gender reassignment surgery.
To be continued
